El Duderino
Member
I love playing Rate Game. It’s a good mindless distraction from all sorts of things, especially when you’re down with an ankle sprain. Some feedback, suggestions and perhaps a new feature from my idle time--
Hotness Rater
- Seems like there is a good influx of new pics and frequent lead changes on the big board.
- Fresh unrated pics pop up very regularly.
- Meanwhile, I checked up on some old uploads of mine- this poor girl has been waiting over 7 years for her 11th vote https://hotnessrater.com/picture/1321848/emily-trosclair
while this image has 19,798 https://hotnessrater.com/picture/22809/analu-campos
- I’m really tired of Simone Villas Boas’s 6,168 catalog images.
- Have you ever thought about a daily cap on uploads per user?
- I have never understood how a pic can win AND lose against another, with the zillions of images on here?
- Unrated pics battle unrated pics pretty frequently. Just an observation.
Babes Rater
- There are 125-150 tired old pics that pop-up for rating WAAAAY too often-- over and over and over on a short loop. We all know which ones they are.
- A new pic’s final rating is pretty much determined 24 hours after acquiring a rating.
- The same handful of pics, with the same rating, have been at the top of the leader board forever.
- Have you ever considered tweaking the algorithm to account for the pics that have been around from the beginning of Babes Rater with very little competition in the early days? Variety is nice. Stale sucks. Try running that same image of Janine Habeck through the grinder today and I bet the result will be very different.
- Given, adult models work under all kinds of aliases, but labeling has gotten pretty loose. I’ve voted for Adrienn Levi over her exact same Anonymous image countless times. And Connie Carter over Connie. What about adding the “report” button, like Hotness Rater, to clean some things up? I would use it.
- Sex acts are always in the left column. Just an observation.
- The five “Hottest New Uploads” thing is a great feature. Do 10 perhaps?
- You don’t see too many pics that say “unrated.” Why not open up the floodgate a little more and approve more fresh images from the hopper?
Randomness is the thing that I appreciate most in “pick one” sites. And deep cuts - to use an old rock album term - not just a girl’s top image haunting me again and again in this case.
But I could be wrong.
Hotness Rater
- Seems like there is a good influx of new pics and frequent lead changes on the big board.
- Fresh unrated pics pop up very regularly.
- Meanwhile, I checked up on some old uploads of mine- this poor girl has been waiting over 7 years for her 11th vote https://hotnessrater.com/picture/1321848/emily-trosclair
while this image has 19,798 https://hotnessrater.com/picture/22809/analu-campos
- I’m really tired of Simone Villas Boas’s 6,168 catalog images.
- Have you ever thought about a daily cap on uploads per user?
- I have never understood how a pic can win AND lose against another, with the zillions of images on here?
- Unrated pics battle unrated pics pretty frequently. Just an observation.
Babes Rater
- There are 125-150 tired old pics that pop-up for rating WAAAAY too often-- over and over and over on a short loop. We all know which ones they are.
- A new pic’s final rating is pretty much determined 24 hours after acquiring a rating.
- The same handful of pics, with the same rating, have been at the top of the leader board forever.
- Have you ever considered tweaking the algorithm to account for the pics that have been around from the beginning of Babes Rater with very little competition in the early days? Variety is nice. Stale sucks. Try running that same image of Janine Habeck through the grinder today and I bet the result will be very different.
- Given, adult models work under all kinds of aliases, but labeling has gotten pretty loose. I’ve voted for Adrienn Levi over her exact same Anonymous image countless times. And Connie Carter over Connie. What about adding the “report” button, like Hotness Rater, to clean some things up? I would use it.
- Sex acts are always in the left column. Just an observation.
- The five “Hottest New Uploads” thing is a great feature. Do 10 perhaps?
- You don’t see too many pics that say “unrated.” Why not open up the floodgate a little more and approve more fresh images from the hopper?
Randomness is the thing that I appreciate most in “pick one” sites. And deep cuts - to use an old rock album term - not just a girl’s top image haunting me again and again in this case.
But I could be wrong.
Last edited:
